Snacksmate

Exercise Snacks

Remote Exercise Snacking in Older Adults: Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined short, remote exercise bouts in insufficiently active older adults. Exercise snacking improved lower-limb strength and endurance, but did not show a clear balance benefit.

Frontiers in physiology2026Meta-analysis

Illustration of a small group of older adults performing a short bout of exercise.

Study overview

Study title
Remote exercise snacking and fall-related functional outcomes in older adults: a systematic review including a meta-analysis.
Study authors
Simin Zhang, Mingkuai Wang, Ruting Lin, Zhenyu Shuai, Zeping Lv, Chu Wang, Ran Zhang, Tian Yang, Yubo Wang, Xuemin Zhang
Population
Insufficiently active, healthy older adults
Sample size
313
Duration
Interventions lasting 6 weeks or longer showed greater strength improvements; other intervention timings were not specified.
Comparator
No specific intervention
Outcomes
Lower-limb muscle strength, Lower-limb muscle endurance, Balance, Adherence, Acceptability, Feasibility

Intervention

Remote exercise snacking: at least two daily exercise bouts of 10 minutes or less, using any exercise type or intensity, with complete rest or at least 30 minutes of recovery between sessions; some interventions used progression or video guidance.

Main findings

Across four publications comprising ten studies and 313 participants, remote exercise snacking improved lower-limb strength and endurance, while the effect on balance was not statistically significant. Mean adherence was 85%, and greater strength gains were reported with interventions lasting at least 6 weeks and those using progression.

What this may mean in practice

Snacksmate's reading of the evidence — not a quotation from the original paper.

This review supports remote exercise snacking as a promising approach for improving lower-limb strength and endurance in healthy older adults, but it did not establish a clear benefit for balance. Longer programs and progression may be useful features, although implementation details varied across studies.

Original study

DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1709619

View original study

What can you take from this?

The notes above are Snacksmate’s reading of this study, not personal advice.

Back to all research

Try a few minutes in Snacksmate